Summary: | New ebuild: dia-newcanvas-0.6.10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | David Grant <davidgrant> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 28305 | ||
Attachments: |
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild
dia-newcanvas new ebuild dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild |
Description
David Grant
2003-09-09 14:51:34 UTC
Created attachment 17366 [details]
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild
Created attachment 21285 [details]
dia-newcanvas new ebuild
Can someone please verify this ebuild? I want to know if I did it correctly.
didn't you say License was LGPL? LICENSE="GPL-2" use mirror://sourceforge verify the DOCS line is this necessary : src_compile() { cd ${S} local myconf econf || die make || die } and if so why? and why doesn't it use the gnome2 inherited functions? Created attachment 21660 [details]
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild
Please test
Created attachment 21661 [details]
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild
Basically the same thing, but I removed the GCONF redefine statement which I
didn't think was necessary.
better, but which version of LGPL? Sorry, I'm not at home right now, but I just checked, it's 2.1. So I guess LGPL-2 LICENSE="LGPL-2.1" Then (compare to /usr/portage/licenses ) marking this later, the project seems a little dead (last activity early 2003). This is required for gael, reopening. The site does not offer any files, and the author has stopped working on the project. He only plans to offer older builds at an unspecified date. |