|Summary:||=www-client/epiphany-2.26* needs stabilization due to =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1*|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) <nirbheek>|
|Component:||[OLD] GNOME||Assignee:||Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>|
|Severity:||normal||CC:||betelgeuse, djcater+gentoobugs, stefan.hoelldampf|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:||285586|
|Bug Blocks:||261562, 263083, 280393, 281427|
Description Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) 2009-08-21 08:29:33 UTC
See subject, firefox-3.5.2 needs swift stabilization due to security and hardened issues.
Comment 1 Mart Raudsepp 2009-08-21 08:32:58 UTC
Stabilize the security supported firefox-3.0.x bump that fixes security issues?
Comment 2 Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) 2009-08-21 08:43:57 UTC
So >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.16.0 is no issue with stable gnome?
Comment 3 Mart Raudsepp 2009-08-21 08:46:42 UTC
Perhaps it's fine. Needs testing I can't conduct before some unknown time (8-24 hours).
Comment 4 Fabiano Francesconi 2009-08-21 12:28:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #2) > So >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.16.0 is no issue with stable gnome? > I'm currently using all liferea-1.6.0 deps with stable gnome. No issue so far.. I think it's time to stabilize it up.
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2009-09-14 16:27:21 UTC
Maybe this should be done with bug 281427 Also, I am using gtk+-2.16 with gnome 2.24 in one of my systems without problems, but I haven't tested any gtk+ app, then, maybe would be safer to do it with 2.26 stabilization :-/
Comment 6 Mart Raudsepp 2009-09-19 15:37:48 UTC
*** Bug 283037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Mart Raudsepp 2009-09-19 15:38:11 UTC
Reminder: epiphany-extensions-2.26 needs to be stabilized in tandem
Comment 8 Mart Raudsepp 2009-09-21 01:07:40 UTC
Hello arches, after you have gtk+-2.16 stabilized in bug 285586, please stabilize the following to enable xulrunner-1.9.1 compatibility, so that things don't break once you get to bug 280393 (firefox 3.5): www-client/epiphany-2.26.3-r1 www-client/epiphany-extensions-2.26.1 I presume you'd be testing that these still work fine with xulrunner-1.9.0.x at first. When you are testing bug 280393 (xulrunner-1.9.1.x and firefox-3.5) in the future, please try to test that your latest stable epiphany-2.26 still works afterwards (might need rebuilds though) against xulrunner-1.9.1 too when it gets stabled. During the stabilization of this now (against xul-1.9.0 or otherwise), in addition to your normal tests, please also ensure that nsplugins - such as adobe-flash or swfdec-mozilla - remain available to epiphany. ppc64, you don't have epiphany-extensions, so you can skip that (or you can consider ~ppc64'ing it).
Comment 9 Markus Meier 2009-09-22 11:44:22 UTC
Comment 10 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2009-09-25 17:58:06 UTC
Comment 11 nixnut (RETIRED) 2009-09-27 15:34:48 UTC
Comment 12 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2009-10-03 14:21:10 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 13 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2009-11-28 19:10:07 UTC
Comment 14 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-01-18 00:56:44 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 15 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-01-18 00:56:53 UTC