Summary: | media-libs/sdl-gfx-2.0.19: won't compile | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Denis Sokolovsky <ganellon> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | mlspamcb |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2008.0 | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Denis Sokolovsky
2009-07-02 20:48:30 UTC
See bug #275907, latest stable media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta16 is broken. Mask it and downgrade to media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta14 and sdl-gfx will work again. (In reply to comment #1) > See bug #275907, latest stable media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta16 is broken. > Mask it and downgrade to media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta14 and sdl-gfx will work > again. > You are wrong. Both la file and static archive of libcaca is installed. libcucul, on the other hand, is correctly not installed, as it does not exist anymore. As for the reporter: use revdep-rebuild (or have a look at xcb-rebuilder.sh from x11-libs/libxcb and create similar for libcucul). hm. libcucul.so is installed....? > hm. libcucul.so is installed....?
libcucul.so is symlink to libcaca.so. Have media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta16.
revdep-rebuild rebuild all sdl libraries (including libsdl) and now evrything is ok.
Hmm, should I run revdep-rebuild every time before reporting a bug?
Maybe not every time, but it's something that should be done every once in awhile. Actually, this is a rather special case, as revdep-rebuild is meant more for library major version change (like when readline goes from libreadline.so.5 to libreadline.so.6 or nspr goes from /usr/lib/nspr/libnspr4.so.7 to /usr/lib/nspr/libnspr4.so.8). So, as I understand this bug is really not a bug and must be closed. Who must close bug: I as reporter or somebody from staff? P.S. may be for such special cases is worth to include some news or, may be, forcibly run revdep-rebuild? Not a bug --> INVALID |