Summary: | Please make gnustep-base/gnustep-base (and the eclass?) use virtual/libffi | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) <ssuominen> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Gnustep project <gnustep> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 272046 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Samuli Suominen (RETIRED)
2009-06-01 08:20:05 UTC
Eclass (and gnustep apps) does not care about libffi or ffcall enabled, so we only have to deal with gnustep-base :) I'll take a look and test it (hoping I don't have to immediatly rebuild all my gcc's with USE=-libffi!) gnustep-base-1.18.0-r4 added under the virtual/libffi package.mask entry (gnustep-base has keywords for alpha ppc and x86-fbsd, not there yet in libffi). To get correct include path, I've supposed all libffi matching the virtual will have a pkg-config file, and used pkg-config to get the includedir (In reply to comment #2) > gnustep-base-1.18.0-r4 added under the virtual/libffi package.mask entry > (gnustep-base has keywords for alpha ppc and x86-fbsd, not there yet in > libffi). It's now unmasked. > > To get correct include path, I've supposed all libffi matching the virtual will > have a pkg-config file, and used pkg-config to get the includedir > Correct. |