Summary: | gnome-base/gvfs relies on bluez only | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Manfred Knick <Manfred.Knick> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Manfred Knick
2009-03-10 11:31:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > gnome-base/gvfs ebuilds depend on bluez. Which version of gvfs are you trying to merge? gnome-base/gvfs-1.0.3-r2 is the last ~arch revision which supports bluez-libs. Later versions have a patch for bluez-4 support, and are masked. [snip] > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] net-wireless/bluez-libs-3.36 USE="-debug" > [ebuild N ] net-wireless/bluez-4.21 USE="alsa cups doc examples gstreamer > usb -debug -old-daemons -test-programs" > [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gvfs-1.0.3-r10 USE="bluetooth*" > [ebuild N ] media-video/totem-2.24.4 USE="bluetooth gnome nsplugin python > -debug -galago -lirc -nautilus -nvtv -tracker" > [ebuild R ] kde-base/solid-4.2.1 USE="bluetooth*" > [blocks B ] net-wireless/bluez ("net-wireless/bluez" is blocking > net-wireless/bluez-libs-3.36) > [blocks B ] net-wireless/bluez-libs ("net-wireless/bluez-libs" is blocking > net-wireless/bluez-4.21) Why do you have =net-wireless/bluez-4* unmasked? Is there some functionality that you need? If that's the case, you need to unmask gvfs-1.0.3-r12 (which has bluez-4 support). Else, just re-mask bluez-4. Removing from 2.24 release deps since this is a bug about a masked package. thanks for reporting but handling of bluez-4 (which requires patch) was done in bug #250615. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 250615 *** (In reply to comment #1) Seems that "autounmask =gnome-base/gnome-2.24.1" and manual post-processing went too far ... > Removing from 2.24 release deps since this is a bug about a masked package. Thanks a lot! |