Summary: | Stable request for sci-electronics/oregano-0.69.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jens-Uwe Peter <jup.coburg> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood <sci-electronics> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | calchan, wrigjl |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | fix for build system to respect LDFLAGS |
Description
Jens-Uwe Peter
2008-04-23 14:13:04 UTC
A couple of things about oregano. Gustavo Zacarias used to maintain it but he's retired now. I have never used it although I remember doing some minor fixes on it at some point. So I don't have much knowledge of it, and it's using scons to build which... err... I won't comment about. Right now oregano-0.60.0 doesn't build on my machine. Because of that I can't recommend it for stabilization. Also, when I quickly looked at the ebuild I saw that it's need of some fixes. I suggest we postpone this. I'll try and fix it ASAP but it's not at the top of my TODO list. Denis. (In reply to comment #1) > Right now oregano-0.60.0 doesn't build on my machine. Because of that I can't > recommend it for stabilization. Also, when I quickly looked at the ebuild I saw > that it's need of some fixes. > > I suggest we postpone this. I'll try and fix it ASAP but it's not at the top of > my TODO list. Right now, no version of oregano compiles. There is a patch to patch 0.40 compile in bug #193690. Why not just apply it and call it a day? I looked briefly at 0.69.0 and it looks like similiar issues to 0.60 as you say. At least the 0.69.0 is compiling here (x86, amd64) Tested on x86: No issues, current stable does not work. This should go x86 soon! Compiles and works well here on stable amd64 chroot, but gives * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected * Please include the following list of files in your report: * /usr/bin/oregano Created attachment 232757 [details, diff]
fix for build system to respect LDFLAGS
amd64/x86 stable, thanks Thomas (both of you) |