Bug 214850 – x11-libs/gtksourceview-2 ebuild syntax highlighting fix

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: VERIFIED NEEDINFO

[Description René 'Necoro' Neumann 2008-03-26 11:05:45 UTC]

The gentoo.lang introduced with bug #194462 needs some fixes, as the sh.lang, on which it depends, has changed.

I'll attach a patch.
This mainly removes the workarounds for the shell syntax which aren't needed anymore. And as this workarounds relied on internal definitions of the shell syntax the current gentoo.lang does not work anymore - so there is actually the _need_ to remove them.

And additionally "elog" is added to the list of portage commands.

[Comment 1 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2008-03-26 11:09:47 UTC]

*** Bug 214853 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 2 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2008-03-26 11:10:59 UTC]

Created attachment 147369 [details, diff]
gentoo.lang.patch

The patch

[Comment 3 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2008-04-09 21:33:13 UTC]

not sure why but I applied the patch here and it didn't seem to make any change.

[Comment 4 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2008-04-09 21:55:36 UTC]

Hmm ... for gtksourceview-2.2.0 there is no difference ... but for 2.0.2 there is

But as the patch removes some hackery, I vote for also include it in 2.2.0 :)

[Comment 5 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2008-04-09 22:03:50 UTC]

Hmm ... throws errors with gtksourceview-2.0.2 ... so ... something was screwed up, when I was writing the patch ...

I have to review this and rewrite it, so that it does not depend on any shell internals that might change.

[Comment 6 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2008-11-22 00:04:47 UTC]

please update your patch for inclusion.

[Comment 7 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2009-03-08 21:07:28 UTC]

please get back to us.

[Comment 8 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2009-03-08 22:06:28 UTC]

Portato-0.12 was released - so now I've time for looking into this issue. I think you can expect a result during this week.

[Comment 9 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2009-03-08 22:12:39 UTC]

good, thanks for not forgetting about us :)

[Comment 10 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2009-10-28 22:50:14 UTC]

Please get back to us. I think part of your stuff is merged with bug #275110. But there's probably other things that would allow us to fix bug #280533.

[Comment 11 Pacho Ramos 2010-03-12 12:01:01 UTC]

Closing until patch is updated, feel free to reopen then

Thanks

[Comment 12 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2010-10-18 09:32:34 UTC]

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug, however, since it has not been updated to provide the request information, we cannot help in resolving your issue.