Summary: | app-accessibility/gnome-speech doesn't compile w/ USE=java | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Luis Vitorio Cargnini <lvcargnini> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gnome-accessibility+disabled, m-one |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
gnome-speech-0.4.15.ebuild
gnome-speech-0.4.15-java-classpath.patch |
Description
Luis Vitorio Cargnini
2007-08-08 17:55:22 UTC
Created attachment 127308 [details]
gnome-speech-0.4.15.ebuild
The ebuild file modified to apply the patch for java
Created attachment 127309 [details, diff]
gnome-speech-0.4.15-java-classpath.patch
The patch file to fix the Java compiler problem
(In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=127309) [edit] > gnome-speech-0.4.15-java-classpath.patch > > The patch file to fix the Java compiler problem > please submit this patch upstream to gnome-speech maintainers (In reply to comment #3) > > please submit this patch upstream to gnome-speech maintainers > Forgot to add that post the submission url back here. *** Bug 199265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** adding concerned herd. +*gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1 (05 Jun 2011) + + 05 Jun 2011; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1.ebuild, + +files/gnome-speech-0.4.25-disable-java.patch: + Drop java support as configure is completly broken and makes that support + automagic (bug #188136), also, looks like nothing in the tree needs that + support and other distributions are already suppling this without java + support for a long time. + (In reply to comment #7) > +*gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1 (05 Jun 2011) > + > + 05 Jun 2011; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1.ebuild, > + +files/gnome-speech-0.4.25-disable-java.patch: > + Drop java support as configure is completly broken and makes that support > + automagic (bug #188136), also, looks like nothing in the tree needs that > + support and other distributions are already suppling this without java > + support for a long time. > + I guess we can drop java from metadata as well. That is up to java team I think |