Summary: | gdm-themes-2.0-r1 contains undistributable themes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Arthur Hagen <art-gt> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Steve Dibb (RETIRED) <beandog> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | cla, cpwins, gnome, humpback, jrmalaq, qa |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 109755, 154060, 184083 |
Description
Arthur Hagen
2007-02-17 20:39:04 UTC
Not maintained by the gnome herd. According to Bug 109755 humpback doesn't support gdm-themes anymore, and the gnome herd doesn't want it. Can someone reassign it to orphaned or find someone to do a coup de grâce on this package? treecleaners, please do your magic. 13:51:50 <@HumpBack> jakub: How about a remove of gdm-themes from the tree? 13:52:32 <@jakub> HumpBack: yeah, esp. wrt the licensing issues 13:52:47 <@jakub> I've had a quick look and it looks like complete mess 13:53:17 <@HumpBack> jakub: It is. Mail to -dev or just remove the bastard? 13:53:18 <@jakub> HumpBack: not really keen on 'auditing' which licenses are OK or not 13:53:27 <@jakub> HumpBack: eh, p.masked and then mail 13:54:04 <@jakub> HumpBack: just emphasize in the mail that it will be removed unless someone does identify the unlicensed stuff (which noone will do :P) 13:54:10 <@HumpBack> jakub: whant to please do that. I have no access to my development machine right now # Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@gentoo.org> (06 Jul 2007) # Masked for removal. bug #167379. x11-themes/gdm-themes So now there are only a few themes available for GDM on Gentoo? via the portage tree, correct ... nothing is keeping you from installing themes by hand I have created a new and legalized ebuild for the Falling Angel GDM theme (one of the GDM themes in the now masked x11-themes/gdm-themes) See bug #184786. Maintainer wanted! why don't the artwork team takes this ? It's cool to have this teams on the tree i or maybe gnome herd don't mind to maintain it but maybe it could be artwork team job. What do you think of this ? adding Cla as artwork team lead. (In reply to comment #8) > why don't the artwork team takes this ? I don't think that artwork team will be keen on doing licensing audit on this package. :P I'll take over maintainership of the package, and get the copyright issues fixed. removed p.mask, kicked out old themes, all new ones with known licenses, committed to CVS. |