| Summary: | 2.6.16 - mark newer fcdsl, fritzcapi, slmodem stable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) <genstef> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Dialup Developers <net-dialup> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | x86 |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 131353 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 126972 | ||
|
Description
Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED)
2006-04-26 08:52:18 UTC
#1. What versions of each need to be marked stable? #2. Have you have verified that these versions, do, in fact, compile and work against a 2.6.16 kernel? Feel free to add the arch teams to CC once these have been completed. (In reply to comment #1) > #1. What versions of each need to be marked stable? I said latest versions and I meant latest versions: fritzcapi-2.6.43 fcdsl-2.6.37 slmodem-2.9.11_pre20051101 > #2. Have you have verified that these versions, do, in fact, compile and work > against a 2.6.16 kernel? of course I have. Those have all been fixed for 2.6.16 (can be seen in the changelogs) slmodem is fixed (see other bug) Bleh... I had a nice comment written up here, but hit a collision with genstef's latest comment. I don't feel like re-writing it, either. Anyway, I'm on this for x86. Does amd64 even need to mark these? They don't have a current stable version listed, at all. Anyway, if they should, then you need to add slmodem back to here, as they'll want it, too. If not, then we can remove them from CC entirely. Right, they have not been stable on amd64 better not make these stable on amd64 then. done |