Summary: | repoman should validate use? conditional and atom prefix/postfix syntax | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Zac Medico <zmedico> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | caster |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | InVCS |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 147007 |
Description
Zac Medico
2006-01-09 13:00:00 UTC
Luckily, it seems that games-emulation/gnuboy-1.0.3 is the only offending ebuild in the whole tree. :) Broadening the scope a little, repoman (portage-2.1_pre3-r1) fails to detect inappropriate atom prefix/postfix combinations such as use of the * postfix with prefixes other than = and !=. "foo? bar", which should be "foo? ( bar )", is not detected. (In reply to comment #2) > Broadening the scope a little, repoman (portage-2.1_pre3-r1) fails to detect > inappropriate atom prefix/postfix combinations such as use of the * postfix > with prefixes other than = and !=. > Yes, please. Then we wouldn't have bugs like bug 157197. (In reply to comment #2) > Broadening the scope a little, repoman (portage-2.1_pre3-r1) fails to detect > inappropriate atom prefix/postfix combinations such as use of the * postfix > with prefixes other than = and !=. Fixed in svn r5240 and r5262:5264. (In reply to comment #3) > "foo? bar", which should be "foo? ( bar )", is not detected. Fixed in svn r5305. This has been released in 2.1.2_rc3-r6. |