Summary: | Improving net-dns/djbdns and updating djbdns-setup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) <hansmi> |
Status: | VERIFIED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | rsync://rsync.tar.bz/gentoo-portage-pkalin | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
files/djbdns-setup.patch
djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild.patch |
Description
Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2006-01-09 02:35:14 UTC
Created attachment 76604 [details, diff]
files/djbdns-setup.patch
The patch to my script, djbdns-setup that goes to net-dns/djbdns/files
Created attachment 76605 [details, diff]
djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild.patch
Patch for current djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild
Comment on attachment 76604 [details, diff]
files/djbdns-setup.patch
too long of a name for a patch, fixing.
Done in -r17. Can you test it, please? Well, seems good to me. newbin ${FILESDIR}/djbdns-setup-${PR} djbdns-setup this is a good point I see you didn't like the part about use ipv6 && { I suggested that because it makes the code more clear and easier to maintain (that is why there are a few more comments and the double chdir). It is all right by me both ways. Let's wait for a bit more beating. Closing |