Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 99102 - Enable text_flowed option on reply composition in mutt
Summary: Enable text_flowed option on reply composition in mutt
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Aron Griffis (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-15 06:11 UTC by Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-08-11 16:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Allows option text_flowed to cause mutt to reflow replies and forwards (mutt-flow.patch,547 bytes, patch)
2005-07-15 06:13 UTC, Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-15 06:11:55 UTC
I've received a couple of complaints from mutt users that my emails are't hard-wrapped  at less than 80 characters.  In mutt, display seems fine, as mutt's pager wraps for display fine.  However, when replying, it quotes by sticking '>' in front of a whole paragraph without wrapping it (i.e. leaving it as one long line).  Similarly, when forwarding the text is included without being re-flowed.

It seemed to me that 'set text_flowed=yes' should have caused mutt to hard-wrap text, but it's not activated when composing a reply or a forward.

There's plenty of code already in mutt which can re-flow text well, however it's only invoked if the message being replied to/forwarded has 'flowed' in its MIME Content-Type.  The patch to follow causes mutt to re-flow text when composing replies also if 'text_flowed=yes' is set even if the content type of the original message doesn't specify flowed.
Comment 1 Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-15 06:13:33 UTC
Created attachment 63465 [details, diff]
Allows option text_flowed to cause mutt to reflow replies and forwards
Comment 2 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-11 16:13:08 UTC
I'd rather not include this at the distribution level because I'm concerned it
might have effects that we don't want.

If the patch is correct and desirable, the mutt maintainers should be willing to
take it upstream.  Please contact them about it.