Bug 98537 – wmrack compile fail due to -I without include path

• Status: VERIFIED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description basic 2005-07-10 00:15:30 UTC]

wmrack compile fail due to -I without include path. Patch coming up.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. use recent Xorg installed in /usr
2. emerge wmrack
3.

Actual Results:  
gcc -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -I   -c -o xpmicon.o
xpmicon.c
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/../../../crt1.o(.text+0x18):
In function `_start':
: undefined reference to `main'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x41): In function
`xpm_getDimColor':
: undefined reference to `XGetWindowAttributes'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x64): In function
`xpm_getDimColor':
: undefined reference to `XParseColor'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x172): In function
`xpm_getDimColor':
: undefined reference to `XAllocColor'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x2ab): In function `parseXpm':
: undefined reference to `XpmCreatePixmapFromBuffer'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x4f4): In function
`xpm_loadSet':
: undefined reference to `lib_findfile'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x90d): In function
`xpm_setDefaultSet':
: undefined reference to `XpmCreatePixmapFromData'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x991): In function
`xpm_setDefaultSet':
: undefined reference to `XpmCreatePixmapFromData'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x9de): In function
`xpm_freeSet':
: undefined reference to `XFreePixmap'
/var/tmp/portage/wmrack-1.2.0/temp/ccKAGzkC.o(.text+0x9f6): In function
`xpm_freeSet':
: undefined reference to `XFreePixmap'


Expected Results:  
compile install qmerge clean

[Comment 1 basic 2005-07-10 00:16:19 UTC]

Created attachment 63055 [details, diff]
patch

[Comment 2 Michele Noberasco (RETIRED) 2005-07-18 02:27:20 UTC]

Added some econf magic to wmrack ebuild that should make provided patch non
necessary... does it work for you?

[Comment 3 Michele Noberasco (RETIRED) 2005-08-16 03:41:51 UTC]

After a month of silence I assume it *does* work...

[Comment 4 basic 2005-08-16 05:20:53 UTC]

sorry didn't get a chance to test it. Just tested it though. works now

[Comment 5 Michele Noberasco (RETIRED) 2005-08-16 06:19:01 UTC]

Glad to read this :-)