TIA for putting in CVS.
Created attachment 62189 [details] hb-net-advanced.xml
Created attachment 62190 [details] hb-net-functions.xml
Created attachment 62191 [details] hb-net-management.xml
Created attachment 62192 [details] hb-net-modules.xml
Created attachment 62193 [details] hb-net-start.xml
Created attachment 62194 [details] hb-net-wireless.xml
Created attachment 62195 [details, diff] handbook-alpha.xml.diff
Created attachment 62196 [details, diff] handbook-amd64.xml.diff
Created attachment 62197 [details, diff] handbook-hppa.xml.diff
Created attachment 62198 [details, diff] handbook-alpha.xml.diff
Created attachment 62199 [details, diff] handbook-amd64.xml.diff
Created attachment 62200 [details, diff] handbook-hppa.xml.diff
Created attachment 62201 [details, diff] handbook-mips.xml.diff
Created attachment 62202 [details, diff] handbook-ppc.xml.diff
Created attachment 62203 [details, diff] handbook-ppc64.xml.diff
Created attachment 62204 [details, diff] handbook-sparc.xml.diff
Created attachment 62205 [details, diff] handbook-x86.xml.diff
Created attachment 62206 [details, diff] index.xml.diff added info about a new handbook translator
Created attachment 62207 [details, diff] metadoc.xml.diff added info to metadoc.xml about another man who did so much work he deserves being a team member
Created attachment 62245 [details, diff] metadoc.diff
rane: i thought you were going to let the cvs goons edit metadoc after our little snafu? not that it really matters... if this bug is still around when i get home from work, i will handle it then
(In reply to comment #21) > rane: i thought you were going to let the cvs goons edit metadoc after our > little snafu? not that it really matters... Yes, but this time it's problem with adding a new man with mail and full name, so i decided to make patch with him. After applying a patch you will have to add new docs to metadoc as always, right? :]
(In reply to comment #18) > Created an attachment (id=62206) [edit] > index.xml.diff > > added info about a new handbook translator rane: this patch fails on 4 out of 4 hunks... (metadoc patched ok)
someone PLEASE make this man a dev... i can't stand editing all these files by hand... in any case, in cvs. thanks