Created attachment 917560 [details] Add multilib support to net-libs/enet Missing multilib support in ebuild
Why does this package need multilib support?
Obviously every package should support multilib if it is available on 32/64bit platforms so one is able to use both 32 and 64 bit versions of the library package. The packages are outdated and should be updated to support multilib. I don't understand why you even ask why the support is needed. Packages not providing multilib support are obviously outdated and keeps users from using both 32/64 bit version of the packages.
We've been actively dropping support for 32bit multilib *unless* it's needed by something, it's just wasteful otherwise. Adds a maintenance cost, and wastefully builds libraries users don't need if they enable abi_x86_32 globally for e.g. wine (can be a pain to maintain a precise list). "Something" is typically a package that needs 32bit libraries such as aforementioned app-emulation/wine-*, or sometimes we make exceptions if users commonly need it to run old 32bit applications such as prebuilt games (these often come with their own bundled libs though).
As Ionen said, we only add multilingual support where it serves some useful purpose.
Please provide an example of a prebuilt application which requires this library.
Created attachment 917858 [details] updated with git and multilib for all versions
You obviously interchanged ABI/FHS multilib support with I18N multilingual support both are totally independent of each other.
Created attachment 917859 [details] updated with git and multilib for all versions
Created attachment 917860 [details] updated with git and multilib for all versions
(In reply to Jon Daniel from comment #7) > You obviously interchanged ABI/FHS multilib support with I18N multilingual > support both are totally independent of each other. My iPad auto-corrected "multilib" to "multilingual". ^_^;
*** Bug 948860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 948981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 949024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Closing this as invalid since no justification has been given for adding multilib support.
Why do you state that you've been dropping multilib support and don't write it at the multilib ebuild guidelines. Is your statement related to the funtoo forum entrance https://forums.funtoo.org/topic/1896-dealing-with-multilib-removal/. as are the comments about referring to binary users and wine too. I don't see anything in the ebuild documentation about dropping multilib support.
No, and I didn't say it's being dropped, but rather dropped where there's no justification to keep it. It's not a all or nothing deal.