Bug 943723 – sys-apps/flashrom-1.4.0 fails tests with LTO (1 cmocka test flashrom FAIL 0.01s killed by signal 11 SIGSEGV)

• Status: CONFIRMED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2024-11-18 07:57:20 UTC]

https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: sys-apps/flashrom-1.4.0 fails tests.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: lto_tinderbox)
System: LTO-SYSTEM (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox/Common_Issues_Helper#LTO)

Info about the issue:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox/Common_Issues_Helper#CF0015

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2024-11-18 07:57:22 UTC]

Created attachment 908937 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2024-11-18 07:57:22 UTC]

Created attachment 908938 [details]
1-testlog.txt

1-testlog.txt

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2024-11-18 07:57:23 UTC]

Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary:


1/1 cmocka test flashrom        FAIL            0.01s   killed by signal 11 SIGSEGV
1/1 cmocka test flashrom FAIL            0.01s   killed by signal 11 SIGSEGV
Program sphinx-build found: NO
Run-time dependency libjaylink found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake)

[Comment 4 Sam James 2024-11-18 08:00:08 UTC]

Let me check if it's a gcc-15 thing first.

[Comment 5 Sam James 2024-11-18 08:11:03 UTC]

It fails with 12/13/14/15 at least (not tried others). Filtering LTO works around it. Needs more investigation.

[Comment 6 Sam James 2024-12-25 01:44:24 UTC]

(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> It fails with 12/13/14/15 at least (not tried others). Filtering LTO works
> around it. Needs more investigation.

wait, if it's cmocka (=> -Wl,--wrap use), then it's not fixable (see bug 877741). The question is whether that's the problem or not or if it's another test that's failing that isn't relying on wrapping.

[Comment 7 Fabian Groffen 2024-12-25 09:20:52 UTC]

it probably does, but does this also happen with 1.5.0?