Bug 942574 – app-editors/xemacs-21.5.35-r4: stablereq

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Eli Schwartz 2024-10-31 04:56:16 UTC]

Please stabilize

 app-editors/xemacs-21.5.35-r4: no change for 32 days, since 2024-09-28

[Comment 1 Eli Schwartz 2024-10-31 04:58:21 UTC]

Seems to fail an awful lot on the binhost due to the large number of chances to pull this or one of its reverse dependencies in for randomized installation. :P

[Comment 2 Mats Lidell 2024-10-31 07:52:58 UTC]

(In reply to Eli Schwartz from comment #1)
> Seems to fail an awful lot on the binhost due to the large number of chances
> to pull this or one of its reverse dependencies in for randomized
> installation. :P

Thanks for the reminder to stabilize. First time I get an external stablereq. I can just CC the relevant arch teams in case I think the build is ready?

About the problem reported. I'm sorry I don't understand. What is failing? Something I can check myself?

[Comment 3 Eli Schwartz 2024-10-31 12:07:14 UTC]

(In reply to Mats Lidell from comment #2)
> Thanks for the reminder to stabilize. First time I get an external
> stablereq. I can just CC the relevant arch teams in case I think the build
> is ready?


If you agree with the stablereq then adding "CC-ARCHES" to the bugzilla Keywords field will allow the NATTkA bot to handle all the rest for you.


> About the problem reported. I'm sorry I don't understand. What is failing?
> Something I can check myself?


It's already fixed by https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c390fa2cb398038e30190e64d6ed41e88db5d5ea and just needs stabilizing. :)

[Comment 4 Mats Lidell 2024-10-31 13:08:15 UTC]

(In reply to Eli Schwartz from comment #3)
> If you agree with the stablereq then adding "CC-ARCHES" to the bugzilla
> Keywords field will allow the NATTkA bot to handle all the rest for you.

Thanks for confirming.

> It's already fixed by
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/
> ?id=c390fa2cb398038e30190e64d6ed41e88db5d5ea and just needs stabilizing. :)

Hmm... I know. My fix ;-) 

I'm still confused by the "Seems to fail an awful lot..." but I assume it is not an issue now. Will move over to CC arches.

[Comment 5 Sam James 2024-10-31 15:21:34 UTC]

sparc done

[Comment 6 Sam James 2024-10-31 15:21:35 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 7 Sam James 2024-10-31 15:21:36 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 8 Eli Schwartz 2024-10-31 15:48:20 UTC]

(In reply to Mats Lidell from comment #4)
> I'm still confused by the "Seems to fail an awful lot..." but I assume it is
> not an issue now. Will move over to CC arches.


I just meant that the build bot ended up trying an awful lot of times, to build xemacs-21.5.35 (and failing) and after this stablereq it will try to build 21.5.35-r4 instead (and succeed).

That's all. Thanks for the stablereq. :)

[Comment 9 Arthur Zamarin 2024-10-31 17:05:49 UTC]

arm64 done

[Comment 10 Arthur Zamarin 2024-10-31 19:36:39 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 11 Arthur Zamarin 2024-11-01 16:29:28 UTC]

amd64 done

all arches done