Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 93725 - mysqltool installed into root directory (ver 0.95-r2 and 0.95-r3)
Summary: mysqltool installed into root directory (ver 0.95-r2 and 0.95-r3)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Francesco R. (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-23 12:47 UTC by Talamona Francesco
Modified: 2006-01-27 12:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Talamona Francesco 2005-05-23 12:47:18 UTC
Instead of going to /var/www/localhost/htdocs/mysqltool it is installed to /mysqltool.

This affects both 0.95-r2 and 0.95-r3, 0.95-r1 is installed in /home/httpd/htdocs/mysqltool/

I just recompiled dev-db/mysqltool-0.95-r2 (fisrt install was at 31 dec 2004), because it did work no more after apache upgrade to 2.0.54-r5.

Other packages went to right location (namely cacti and phpmyadmin) so I don't think it is due to my environment being broken.

Is this package still mantained upstream?
Comment 1 Patrizio Bassi 2005-07-21 08:10:17 UTC
same here, please fix  
Comment 2 Francesco R. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-26 15:52:46 UTC
Basically the ebuild need to be rewritten from scratch to accomplish to the
changes apache[12] config files had in the time.
inherit webapp.eclass is suggested for the volenterous.

people are you actually using this package or simply curios to see it ?

Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-26 16:02:14 UTC
No maintainer, b0rked, inactive upstream for 1 1/2 year - sounds like a good
candidate for package.mask and removal from the tree.
Comment 4 Talamona Francesco 2005-07-26 16:45:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
[...]
> 
> people are you actually using this package or simply curios to see it ?
> 
I need it no more. If dead upstream, I agree for removal.

Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-26 16:47:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Basically the ebuild need to be rewritten from scratch to accomplish to the
> changes apache[12] config files had in the time.
> inherit webapp.eclass is suggested for the volenterous.

Won't happen it seems - Bug 77539 
Comment 6 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2005-10-06 18:01:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Basically the ebuild need to be rewritten from scratch to accomplish to the
> > changes apache[12] config files had in the time.
> > inherit webapp.eclass is suggested for the volenterous.
> 
> Won't happen it seems - Bug 77539 

It's been masked since August 18th, can we punt it from the tree now? :)
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-27 04:29:56 UTC
@vivo: Please, remove the thing from portage.
Comment 8 Francesco R. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-27 12:35:56 UTC
disappeared