Bug 935242 – dev-libs/libratbag-0.17-r2 fails to compile: libratbag-data.c:610:66: error: implicit declaration of function basename [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

• Status: CONFIRMED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2024-06-30 16:15:04 UTC]

https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: dev-libs/libratbag-0.17-r2 fails to compile.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: tinderbox_musl)
System: MUSL-SYSTEM (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox/Common_Issues_Helper#MUSL)

Info about the issue:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox/Common_Issues_Helper#CF0002

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2024-06-30 16:15:06 UTC]

Created attachment 896669 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2024-06-30 16:15:07 UTC]

Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary:


FAILED: libratbag.a.p/src_libratbag-data.c.o 
../libratbag-0.17/src/libratbag-data.c:610:66: error: implicit declaration of function 'basename'; did you mean 'g_basename'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

[Comment 3 Alex Barker 2024-07-10 04:45:07 UTC]

Created attachment 897386 [details, diff]
basename-musl.patch

I have no idea if this will work and I have no way of testing it with musl. If you could toss it in /etc/portage/patches/dev-libs/libratbag and let me know if it builds, that would help a lot.

[Comment 4 Andreas K. Hüttel 2024-10-24 20:53:52 UTC]

Not C99 related

[Comment 5 aryan 2025-01-07 14:59:40 UTC]

I have tried the suggested patch and it successfully compiles on my musl/llvm system. I am surprised with how simple the patch is. Is there a specific functionality that the library libgen.h provides that helps us in this case?