934579 – sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers: fails tests (sanitizer_nolibc_test_main.x86_64.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized)

Bug 934579 - sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers: fails tests (sanitizer_nolibc_test_main.x86_64.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized)

Summary: sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers: fails tests (sanitizer_nolibc_test_main.x86_...

Status:	UNCONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal
Assignee:	LLVM support project

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	TESTFAILURE

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2024-06-19 22:41 UTC by Arniii
Modified:	2024-11-20 13:49 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
build.log.zip (compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6_build,53.65 KB, application/zip) 2024-06-19 22:47 UTC, Arniii	Details
environment // profile default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop/plasma gcc-13.2.1_p20240210 O3 pipe march=native(verbose) lto graphite ggdb3 (file_934579.txt,167.71 KB, text/plain) 2024-06-19 22:48 UTC, Arniii	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Arniii 2024-06-19 22:41:12 UTC

relevant part of building tests:
```
FAILED: lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-x86_64-Test-Nolibc /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-x86_64-Test-Nolibc
cd /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests && /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/llvm/17/bin/clang++ sanitizer_nolibc_test_main.x86_64.o -Wl,-whole-archive libRTSanitizerCommon.test.nolibc.x86_64.a -Wl,-no-whole-archive -o /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/./Sanitizer-x86_64-Test-Nolibc -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0 -static -nostdlib -m64 -m64
sanitizer_nolibc_test_main.x86_64.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)

```

Comment 1 Arniii 2024-06-19 22:47:23 UTC

Created attachment 896121 [details]
build.log.zip

Comment 2 Arniii 2024-06-19 22:48:09 UTC

Created attachment 896122 [details]
environment // profile default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop/plasma gcc-13.2.1_p20240210 O3 pipe march=native(verbose) lto graphite ggdb3

Comment 3 Arniii 2024-07-03 18:32:36 UTC

reproduced with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-19.0.0_pre20240623

Comment 4 Arniii 2024-08-14 04:26:31 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20240808

Comment 5 Arniii 2024-08-14 20:19:13 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-19.1.0_rc2

Comment 6 Sam James archtester

2024-08-14 20:27:44 UTC

You don't need to update the title for every version change like that unless it's been a while, or someone suggested it was fixed.

Comment 7 Arniii 2024-08-14 22:47:58 UTC

(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> You don't need to update the title for every version change like that unless
> it's been a while, or someone suggested it was fixed.

So, if it's relatively new bug ( less then 9 months old ), then I should just write that something is reproducible, but not update title, am I right?

But if it's old enough, should I update title in this way?

Comment 8 Sam James archtester

2024-08-14 22:50:57 UTC

If it's been a while, yes, maybe once per LLVM release I'd do it.

Comment 9 Arniii 2024-09-05 20:12:17 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20240830

Comment 10 Arniii 2024-09-21 01:39:32 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20240917

Comment 11 Arniii 2024-09-26 12:22:11 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-18.1.8-r1

Comment 12 Arniii 2024-09-26 12:54:26 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-17.0.6-r1

Comment 13 Arniii 2024-11-20 11:15:46 UTC

reproducible with sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106

but with additional fail:

```
FAILED: lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-x86_64-Test /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-x86_64-Test
cd /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests && /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/llvm/20/bin/clang++ SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_addrhashmap_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_allocator_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_array_ref_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_atomic_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_bitvector_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_bvgraph_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_chained_origin_depot_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_common_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_deadlock_detector_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_dense_map_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_flags_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_flat_map_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_format_interceptor_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_hash_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_ioctl_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_leb128_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_libc_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_linux_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_list_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_lzw_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_mac_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_module_uuid_size.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_mutex_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_nolibc_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_posix_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_printf_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_procmaps_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_procmaps_mac_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_range_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_ring_buffer_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_quarantine_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_stack_store_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_stackdepot_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_stacktrace_printer_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_stacktrace_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_stoptheworld_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_suppressions_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_symbolizer_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_test_main.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_thread_arg_retval_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_thread_registry_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_type_traits_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_vector_test.cpp.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.gtest-all.cc.x86_64.o SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.gmock-all.cc.x86_64.o /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/libRTSanitizerCommon.test.x86_64.a -o /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/./Sanitizer-x86_64-Test -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta -resource-dir=/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-20.0.0_pre20241106/work/compiler-rt_build/lib/clang/20 -lstdc++ -g --driver-mode=g++ -ldl -lrt -pthread -m64
SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_addrhashmap_test.cpp.x86_64.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```

Comment 14 Sam James archtester

2024-11-20 13:49:57 UTC

Is this the same scenario as bug 935425?