The dev-perl/DateManip ebuild doesn't seem to follow the naming convention for Perl modules. As the module lives in the Date::Manip namespace shouldn't the ebuild be named dev-perl/Date-Manip? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Because when it was added to the tree many years ago, it was named after the downloaded tarball - which is DateManip. Closing this bug as invalid, because, well, it is.
Well, it should be a wontfix then as it is a completely valid point that this ebuild does not follow the appropriate convention.
But it does follow convention - ebuild name is ${P}, same as the SRC name, ${P}.tar.gz.
