Bug 932671 – app-editors/neovim-0.10.0: unresolved soname dependency on /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/lpeg.so

• Status: CONFIRMED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Matt Turner 2024-05-24 23:20:28 UTC]

Building neovim-0.10.0 shows this QA notice:

> * QA Notice: Unresolved soname dependencies:
> * 
> * 	/usr/bin/nvim: /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/lpeg.so
> *

As a result, `revdep-rebuild` ends up mistakenly thinking that neovim needs a rebuild (see https://github.com/gentoo/gentoolkit/pull/49)

I suspect that `lpeg.so` is a module, and not something that should be directly linked against.

[Comment 1 Matt Turner 2024-06-10 17:06:06 UTC]

Comparing with 0.9.5-r1:

> framework /var/tmp/portage/app-editors # scanelf -n neovim-0.10.0/image/usr/bin/nvim
>  TYPE   NEEDED FILE 
> ET_DYN libluv.so.1,libvterm.so.0,/usr/lib64/lua/5.1/lpeg.so,libmsgpack-c.so.2,libtree-sitter.so.0,libunibilium.so.4,libluajit-5.1.so.2,libm.so.6,libuv.so.1,libc.so.6 neovim-0.10.0/image/usr/bin/nvim 
> framework /var/tmp/portage/app-editors # scanelf -n neovim-0.9.5-r1/image/usr/bin/nvim
>  TYPE   NEEDED FILE 
> ET_DYN libluv.so.1,libtermkey.so.1,libvterm.so.0,libmsgpack-c.so.2,libtree-sitter.so.0,libunibilium.so.4,libluajit-5.1.so.2,libm.so.6,libuv.so.1,libc.so.6 neovim-0.9.5-r1/image/usr/bin/nvim 

"lpeg" doesn't even appear in neovim-0.9.5-r1's build.log.

[Comment 2 Matt Turner 2024-06-10 17:10:03 UTC]

I'm guessing that https://github.com/neovim/neovim/commit/45bcf8386918bbb475fbe20c48b508aa89ed0624 is the upstream commit that made this change.

[Comment 3 Michael Cook 2024-06-10 17:32:56 UTC]

https://github.com/neovim/neovim/commit/9f9cef1b569e226a87c5c74e455bc4fc76cc2fac

I think this is relevant as well.