Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 93075 - failed bitbake emerge
Summary: failed bitbake emerge
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Embedded Gentoo Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-18 08:27 UTC by gwbv
Modified: 2005-05-18 20:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gwbv 2005-05-18 08:27:33 UTC
Emerge bitbake fails when applying a patch

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge bitbake
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
17:33:36 (34.47 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch' saved [11706/11706]

>>> md5 files   ;-) bitbake-0.ebuild
>>> md5 files   ;-) ChangeLog
>>> md5 files   ;-) metadata.xml
>>> md5 files   ;-) files/0-gentoo-paths.patch
>>> md5 files   ;-) files/digest-bitbake-0
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) bbcow9b.patch
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking bbcow9b.patch to /var/tmp/portage/bitbake-0/work
unpack bbcow9b.patch: file format not recognized. Ignoring.
 * subversion check out start -->
 *    checkout from: svn://svn.berlios.de/bitbake/trunk/bitbake
A  bitbake/contrib
A  bitbake/contrib/vim
A  bitbake/contrib/vim/syntax
A  bitbake/contrib/vim/syntax/bitbake.vim
A  bitbake/contrib/vim/ftplugin
A  bitbake/contrib/bbdev.sh
A  bitbake/contrib/README
A  bitbake/AUTHORS
A  bitbake/conf
A  bitbake/conf/bitbake.conf
A  bitbake/doc
A  bitbake/doc/COPYING.MIT
A  bitbake/doc/COPYING.GPL
A  bitbake/doc/manual
A  bitbake/doc/manual/html.css
A  bitbake/doc/manual/usermanual.xml
A  bitbake/doc/manual/Makefile
A  bitbake/lib
A  bitbake/lib/bb
A  bitbake/lib/bb/data.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/data_dict.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/make.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/__init__.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/build.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/data_smart.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/event.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/parse
A  bitbake/lib/bb/parse/__init__.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/parse/ConfHandler.py
A  bitbake/lib/bb/manifest.py
A  bitbake/MANIFEST
A  bitbake/setup.py
A  bitbake/ChangeLog
A  bitbake/bin
A  bitbake/bin/bbread
A  bitbake/bin/bitbake
A  bitbake/bin/bbimage
A  bitbake/classes
A  bitbake/classes/base.bbclass
 U bitbake
Checked out revision 176.
 *    checkouted in: /usr/portage/distfiles/svn-src/bitbake/bitbake
 *      copied to: /var/tmp/portage/bitbake-0/work/bitbake-0

 * Applying 0-gentoo-paths.patch ...               [ ok ] * Applying
bbcow9b.patch ...

 * Failed Patch: bbcow9b.patch !
 *  ( /usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch )
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *   /var/tmp/portage/bitbake-0/temp/bbcow9b.patch-27961.out


!!! ERROR: dev-embedded/bitbake-0 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 358, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: bbcow9b.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


Expected Results:  
done?

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4, gcc-3.3.5-20050130,
glibc-2.2.5-r2,glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1, 2.4.28 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.28 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 1.80GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.5 [2.3.5 (#1, May  3 2005, 15:36:41)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.8.5-r3, 1.9.5, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9, 1.4_p6
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r7
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.16
virtual/os-headers:  2.4.18, 2.4.19-r1, 2.4.22-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.1/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref
/usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"CXXFLAGS="-march=i686
-O3 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acpi acpi4linux adns alsa autofs avi berkdb bitmap-fonts bluetooth
bonobo cdr crypt cscope cups curl eds emboss encode esd fam flac foomaticdb
fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml guile imagemagick imlib
ipv6 jack java jpeg kde libg++ libwww mad mbox mikmod motif mozilla mp3 mpeg
ncurses nls ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib perl png python qt quicktime
readline samba sdl slang spell ssl svga tcltk tcpd tetex tiff truetype
truetype-fonts type1-fonts vorbis xine xml xml2 xmms xv zlib userland_GNU
kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY
Comment 1 gwbv 2005-05-18 08:29:51 UTC
Content of bbcow9b.patch-28245.out


***** bbcow9b.patch *****

=========================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch

=========================
can't find file to patch at input line 11
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|
|# This is a cumulative patch consisting of:
|#
|#   bbcow9a.patch
|#
|# Patch managed by http://www.holgerschurig.de/patcher.html
|#
|
|--- bitbake/bin/bbimage~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/bin/bbimage
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 25
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/classes/base.bbclass~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/classes/base.bbclass
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 45
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/data.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/data.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
14 out of 14 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 352
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 388
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/make.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/make.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 400
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=========================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch

=========================
patching file bin/bbimage
Hunk #1 FAILED at 110.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file bin/bbimage.rej
patching file classes/base.bbclass
Hunk #1 FAILED at 54.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 63.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file classes/base.bbclass.rej
patching file lib/bb/data.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 26 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 46.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 119.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 147.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 205.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 217.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 236.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 257.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 272.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 294.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 367.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 402.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 477.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 541.
13 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/bb/data.py.rej
patching file lib/bb/fetch.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 202.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 290.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 513.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/bb/fetch.py.rej
patching file lib/bb/make.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 108.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/bb/make.py.rej
patching file lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 156.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py.rej
=========================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch

=========================
can't find file to patch at input line 11
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|
|# This is a cumulative patch consisting of:
|#
|#   bbcow9a.patch
|#
|# Patch managed by http://www.holgerschurig.de/patcher.html
|#
|
|--- bitbake/bin/bbimage~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/bin/bbimage
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 25
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/classes/base.bbclass~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/classes/base.bbclass
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 45
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/data.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/data.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
14 out of 14 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 352
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 388
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/make.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/make.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 400
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=========================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch

=========================
missing header for unified diff at line 11 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 11
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|
|# This is a cumulative patch consisting of:
|#
|#   bbcow9a.patch
|#
|# Patch managed by http://www.holgerschurig.de/patcher.html
|#
|
|--- bitbake/bin/bbimage~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/bin/bbimage
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 25 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 25
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/classes/base.bbclass~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/classes/base.bbclass
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 45
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/data.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/data.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
14 out of 14 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 352
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 388
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/make.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/make.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 400
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=========================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/distfiles/bbcow9b.patch

=========================
missing header for unified diff at line 11 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 11
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|
|# This is a cumulative patch consisting of:
|#
|#   bbcow9a.patch
|#
|# Patch managed by http://www.holgerschurig.de/patcher.html
|#
|
|--- bitbake/bin/bbimage~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/bin/bbimage
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 25 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 25
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/classes/base.bbclass~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/classes/base.bbclass
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 45 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 45
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/data.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/data.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
14 out of 14 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 352 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 352
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/fetch.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 388 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 388
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/make.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/make.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 400
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py~bbcow9a
|+++ bitbake/lib/bb/parse/BBHandler.py
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-05-18 20:51:37 UTC
seems like patch has been integrated upstream

removed from ebuild, thanks for the bug