Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 926088 - =sys-apps/portage-3.0.61-r1: emerge --unstable-update ...?
Summary: =sys-apps/portage-3.0.61-r1: emerge --unstable-update ...?
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Enhancement/Feature Requests (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-03-03 09:34 UTC by m1027
Modified: 2024-03-17 21:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description m1027 2024-03-03 09:34:58 UTC
Hi,

I'd be very happy to see a new option for emerge (like --unstable-update) that suggests a package update when

- the installed version is itself unstable
- and there are unstable updates available

Why:

When I install a package (here: emerge -a acme-sh), and there is an unstable version only in portage (3.0.6), I am not particular interested in this exact version. I just agree and let emerge add the keyword for *this* version (=app-crypt/acme-sh-3.0.6 ~arm64).

Also, I would not flag the package entirely with ~arm64 *without* specifying any version. Because then I'd receive unstable updates forever, even if there was a stable one in between. (Thus I would surpass future stable versions.)

The issue I have with that:

There is, e.g., acme-sh-3.0.7 now in portage. (My 3.0.6 has even been removed from portage!)

But emerge --sync && emerge -auDUN @world does not suggest an update.

How would I catch an (unstable) update for my (unstable) installed package?

Thanks