Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 92527 - Information disclosure with HyperThreading (CAN-2005-0109)
Summary: Information disclosure with HyperThreading (CAN-2005-0109)
Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Kernel (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthrea...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-13 12:30 UTC by kfm
Modified: 2009-05-03 15:24 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description kfm 2005-05-13 12:30:26 UTC
Colin Percival (FreeBSD committer and security team member) has claimed to have discovered a flaw potentially affecting a broad array of operating systems that support the use of Intel's HyperThreading technology. He claims that "when running on processors supporting Hyper-Threading Technology, it is possible for a malicious thread to monitor the execution of another thread."

FreeBSD have published an advisory. Here's a short list of links that reference this topic:

http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthreading-considered-harmful/
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc
http://kerneltrap.org/node/5103

Furthermore, he has now apparently written a paper which presumably demonstrates the exact nature of a possible exploit:

http://www.daemonology.net/papers/htt.pdf
Comment 1 kfm 2005-05-13 12:40:02 UTC
It's under review for the CVE list also (whether Linux is affected still seems unclear): http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-0109
Comment 2 kfm 2005-05-13 12:54:32 UTC
One more thing; a discussion is underway on the LKML: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/302424 (seems to be some disagreement as to whether it's really an issue from the point of view of the kernel and, of course, whether it's a big deal).
Comment 3 kfm 2005-06-02 06:51:19 UTC
For the benefit of any watchers on this, here's some further discussion of the
matter:

http://kerneltrap.org/node/5197

Also, Con Kolivas posted a concept patch to the LKML demonstrating a "sample
fix". Here's the (interesting) thread:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/306979
Comment 4 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-11 05:30:24 UTC
Still waiting for upstream to decide, adding to status...
Comment 5 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 17:37:09 UTC
I don't think upstream is able or planning to do anything about this, so closing as CANTFIX.