``` Calculating dependencies [ Results for search key : podman ] * acct-group/podman Latest version available: 0 Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of files: 0 KiB Homepage: Description: Group for app-containers/podman socket License: * app-containers/podman Latest version available: 4.9.2 Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of files: 21216 KiB Homepage: https://github.com/containers/podman/ https://podman.io/ Description: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods with Docker-compatible CLI License: Apache-2.0 BSD BSD-2 CC-BY-SA-4.0 ISC MIT MPL-2.0 * dev-python/podman [ Masked ] Latest version available: 4.9.0 Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of files: 179 KiB Homepage: https://github.com/containers/podman-py/ https://pypi.org/project/podman/ Description: A library to interact with a Podman server License: Apache-2.0 [ Applications found : 3 ] !!! The short ebuild name "=podman-4.9.2" is ambiguous. Please specify !!! one of the above fully-qualified ebuild names instead. ``` In this case, would it be possible to discount `dev-python/podman` (unless fully qualified) as it is Masked, discount `acct-group/podman` (unless fully qualified) as `acct-*` packages are unlikely be manually installed (rather than being installed as dependencies), and therefore automagically select `app-containers/podman` - but still issuing a warning that the package name is ambiguous? N.B. `acct-group/podman` is from an overlay, but I think the observation is valid in regards to `acct-*` packages in general?
