Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 92335 - gnome 2.10.1 meta needs to depend on gnome-desktop 2.10.1
Summary: gnome 2.10.1 meta needs to depend on gnome-desktop 2.10.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-12 00:18 UTC by Andrew Cowie
Modified: 2005-07-01 15:03 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Cowie 2005-05-12 00:18:04 UTC 
gnome-base/gnome-2.10.1 [_pre0] should to depend on >=gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10.1 ... 

You've got an ebuild for gnome-desktop-2.10.1, might as well pull it in. [Noticed this because the version number as shown by gnome-about was wrong]

AfC
Sydney
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-12 03:25:23 UTC 
# grep gnome-desktop /usr/portage/gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.10.1_pre0.ebuild
        >=gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10

You forgot to package.unmask the newer gnome-desktop version, didn
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-12 03:25:23 UTC 
# grep gnome-desktop /usr/portage/gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.10.1_pre0.ebuild
        >=gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10

You forgot to package.unmask the newer gnome-desktop version, didn´t you?
Comment 3 Andrew Cowie 2005-05-12 04:06:00 UTC 
No, my unmask is >=gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.9.92 . Good thinking though. The other possibility was that I already had gnome-desktop-2.10.0 installed, which was in fact the case.

The point I was trying to make is that gnome-2.10_pre0 should RDEPEND on 2.10.1 to  force the upgrade (given that's my perception of how the gnome meta-builds have worked)

AfC
Comment 4 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-01 15:03:08 UTC 
Fixed now. Thanks for the notice.