I'm curious how people feel about adding pkgconf as BDEPEND. I'm trying to remove `pkgconf` from my [implicit-system](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/refs/heads/main/virtual/target-sdk-implicit-system/target-sdk-implicit-system-9999.ebuild#71) because not all ebuilds use it. Would Gentoo be receptive of patches that add pkgconf as a BDEPEND? Reproducible: Always
Sorry, what? Adding pkgconf as a BDEPEND to which package? In general, any package which makes use of pkg-config and doesn't have a BDEPEND on virtual/pkgconfig is probably broken? Does it build from a minimal system that has been depcleaned --with-bdeps=n and re-emerged? Keep in mind it's also an RDEPEND for cmake and meson.
Packages needing pkgconf are likely calling pkg-config instead (or should), and should BDEPEND on virtual/pkgconfig.
Right, Gentoo ebuilds should already be putting virtual/pkgconfig in BDEPEND when necessary. Please do file bugs and/or send patches if there are cases where it is missing.
Sorry, I should have checked if existing ebuilds had it. Thanks for the confirmation! I'll send some patches.