Bug 921524 – www-client/firefox: stabilise on ppc64

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Piotr Kubaj 2024-01-06 22:09:01 UTC]

Works fine on ppc64le.

Reproducible: Always

[addCollapseLink(1, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); Comment 1 NATTkA bot 2024-01-06 22:12:14 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

Sanity check failed:

> www-client/firefox-115.6.0
>   bdepend ppc64 stable profile default/linux/ppc64le/17.0 (12 total)
>     >=gui-libs/wlroots-0.15.1-r1[tinywl]

[addCollapseLink(2, 1, 'Toggle comment display'); Comment 2 NATTkA bot 2024-01-06 22:36:14 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)]

All sanity-check issues have been resolved

[Comment 3 Conrad Kostecki 2024-01-07 00:54:35 UTC]

@mozilla: Please add CC-ARCHES. if you are fine with stablereq.

[Comment 4 Joonas Niilola 2024-01-07 08:27:25 UTC]

Added wlroots maintainers as CC too. Truthfully not a big fan of stabilizing on ppc64 since it already has the most arch-related fixes shipped in Gentoo, and it's not "supported" by upstream meaning they don't build/have CI for ppc64. 

Although I don't strongly oppose it either. We can try, but it means someone with ppc64 will have to provide fixes etc. It may be de-stabilized at very low barrier too if it just doesn't work out.

[Comment 5 Piotr Kubaj 2024-01-07 10:34:35 UTC]

The firefox I'm building for myself doesn't need any patches outside of those that portage has and has been that way for a long time (certainly 102 was also ok). It's possible that some USES will need patched or just be masked, but at least the flags I set are ok.

[Comment 6 Matthew Thode ( prometheanfire ) 2024-01-07 18:23:23 UTC]

I'm fine with this (stabilizing wlroots on ppc64).  It's not an arch I can test on though.

[Comment 7 Leonardo Hernández Hernández 2024-01-07 20:33:34 UTC]

I changed it to wlroots-0.17.0 (0.17.1 was just added to the tree a few days ago)

[Comment 8 matoro 2024-01-23 05:14:24 UTC]

ppc64 done

all arches done