Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 920252 - mail-filter/rspamd-3.7.4: stablereq
Summary: mail-filter/rspamd-3.7.4: stablereq
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Petr Vaněk
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-12-18 07:49 UTC by Petr Vaněk
Modified: 2024-01-22 17:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
=mail-filter/rspamd-3.7.4
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Vaněk gentoo-dev 2023-12-18 07:49:30 UTC
Please stabilize
Comment 1 Petr Vaněk gentoo-dev 2023-12-21 12:00:13 UTC
@x86, I tried to test rspamd in i686 docker container running in amd64 system and one test fail, see https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/issues/4754. The same happens for x86 and ~x86.

I built the image from stage3.Dockerfile with following command:

docker buildx build --file stage3.Dockerfile --build-arg ARCH=x86 --build-arg MICROARCH=i686 --build-arg SUFFIX=-openrc --tag gentoo/i686-openrc --platform linux/amd64 --progress plain --load .

I am curious if it works for you.
Comment 2 Petr Vaněk gentoo-dev 2023-12-29 23:43:54 UTC
Removing amd64, stabilization of more recent ebuild was requested in bug 921014.
Comment 3 matoro archtester 2024-01-22 17:18:08 UTC
This can't be done on x86 due to bug 922250, so instead resolving in favor of bug 918871
Comment 4 Petr Vaněk gentoo-dev 2024-01-22 17:38:23 UTC
I guess it can wait. But I don't think that the issue from the bug 922250 is necessarily a blocker as the problem is in a glibc configuration, which uses 32 bits long time_t rather than 64 bits long on x86. rspamd-3.6-r1 fails exactly the same anyway. And the "fix" in rspamd-3.8 basically just skips the test.
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-01-22 17:40:39 UTC
(In reply to Petr Vaněk from comment #4)
> I guess it can wait. But I don't think that the issue from the bug 922250 is
> necessarily a blocker as the problem is in a glibc configuration, which uses
> 32 bits long time_t rather than 64 bits long on x86. rspamd-3.6-r1 fails
> exactly the same anyway. And the "fix" in rspamd-3.8 basically just skips
> the test.

Exactly. There is no point blocking on it. It's a fundamental ABI issue and it's not indicative of its failure to operate now.