Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 914351 - sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427 +jit fails to configure if clang profile + -glldb ( ebuild problem ? )
Summary: sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427 +jit fails to configure if clang profile + -gl...
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-09-17 11:18 UTC by Arniii
Modified: 2023-09-18 08:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
make.conf ( it's on clang profile ) (make.conf,2.55 KB, text/plain)
2023-09-17 17:14 UTC, Arniii
Details
config log at gcc-jit (config.log,22.86 KB, text/x-log)
2023-09-17 17:15 UTC, Arniii
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arniii 2023-09-17 11:18:27 UTC
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
http://0x0.st/HOm1.log

/etc/portage/make.conf
http://0x0.st/HOmA.conf

it seems the problem is that it gets compile flags from CXXFLAGS and try filters them, but not deleting all unnecessary flags. 

Furthermore, it uses the filtered flags at xgcc , which is totally wrong, because the CXXFLAGS can be clang-specific written.


from config.log:
configure:3539: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include    -V >&5
xgcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-V'
xgcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3550: $? = 1
configure:3539: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include    -qversion >&5
xgcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-qversion'; did you mean '--version'?
xgcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3550: $? = 1
configure:3566: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include    -o conftest -pipe -march=skylake -g -glldb -gdwarf-4 -O2   conftest.c  >&5
xgcc: error: unrecognized debug output level 'lldb'
configure:3569: $? = 1
configure:3782: checking for suffix of object files
configure:3804: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/./gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include    -c -pipe -march=skylake -g -glldb -gdwarf-4 -O2  conftest.c >&5
xgcc: error: unrecognized debug output level 'lldb'
configure:3808: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU C Runtime Library"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "libgcc"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.0"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU C Runtime Library 1.0"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| #define PACKAGE_URL "http://www.gnu.org/software/libgcc/"
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| 
| int
| main ()
| {
| 
|   ;
|   return 0;
| }
configure:3822: error: in `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.3.1_p20230427/work/build-jit/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc':
configure:3824: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details
Comment 1 Arniii 2023-09-17 17:14:07 UTC
Created attachment 870816 [details]
make.conf  ( it's on clang profile )
Comment 2 Arniii 2023-09-17 17:15:05 UTC
Created attachment 870817 [details]
config log at gcc-jit
Comment 3 Arsen Arsenović gentoo-dev 2023-09-17 20:32:47 UTC
That last build log appears to be the wrong one.

I suppose a fix would be to translate -glldb* to -ggdb* in this case.
Comment 4 Arniii 2023-09-18 08:20:19 UTC
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #3)
> That last build log appears to be the wrong one.
> 
> I suppose a fix would be to translate -glldb* to -ggdb* in this case.

yep, that works. though, I guess, it should be somehow solve.
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-09-18 08:25:08 UTC
(In reply to Arniii from comment #4)
> (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #3)
> > That last build log appears to be the wrong one.
> > 
> > I suppose a fix would be to translate -glldb* to -ggdb* in this case.
> 
> yep, that works. though, I guess, it should be somehow solve.

that's not possible, because GCC doesn't support it.
Comment 6 Arniii 2023-09-18 08:35:30 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> (In reply to Arniii from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #3)
> > > That last build log appears to be the wrong one.
> > > 
> > > I suppose a fix would be to translate -glldb* to -ggdb* in this case.
> > 
> > yep, that works. though, I guess, it should be somehow solve.
> 
> that's not possible, because GCC doesn't support it.

I mean make a better filter of options. I don't know where it happens, but I guess it happens to try get only native flags.
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-09-18 08:40:06 UTC
(In reply to Arniii from comment #6)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Arniii from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #3)
> > > > That last build log appears to be the wrong one.
> > > > 
> > > > I suppose a fix would be to translate -glldb* to -ggdb* in this case.
> > > 
> > > yep, that works. though, I guess, it should be somehow solve.
> > 
> > that's not possible, because GCC doesn't support it.
> 
> I mean make a better filter of options. I don't know where it happens, but I
> guess it happens to try get only native flags.

ah, sorry. Yeah, Arsen was suggesting we do that in the ebuild, not that you should have to do it yourself.