905932 – crossdev:arm-none-eabi fails with broken linker args

Bug 905932 - crossdev:arm-none-eabi fails with broken linker args

Summary: crossdev:arm-none-eabi fails with broken linker args

Status:	UNCONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal major (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2023-05-08 09:33 UTC by tigrmango
Modified:	2023-05-16 22:02 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
/var/log/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi-info.log (cross-arm-none-eabi-info.log,22.81 KB, text/x-log) 2023-05-08 09:35 UTC, tigrmango	Details
/var/log/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils.log.xz (cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils.log.xz,2.93 KB, application/x-xz) 2023-05-08 09:35 UTC, tigrmango	Details
/var/tmp/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi/binutils-2.40-r4/temp/binutils-config.logs.tar.xz (binutils-config.logs.tar.xz,5.05 KB, application/x-xz) 2023-05-08 09:36 UTC, tigrmango	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description tigrmango 2023-05-08 09:33:46 UTC

Something adds -Wl,--undefined-version to compiler arguments causing build to fail with cryptic messages

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.sudo crossdev --target arm-none-eabi -s4
2.wait
3.???
Actual Results:  
* error: binutils failed :(

Expected Results:  
compiled and installed the toolchain

Comment 1 tigrmango 2023-05-08 09:35:13 UTC

Created attachment 861302 [details]
/var/log/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi-info.log

Comment 2 tigrmango 2023-05-08 09:35:29 UTC

Created attachment 861303 [details]
/var/log/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils.log.xz

Comment 3 tigrmango 2023-05-08 09:36:46 UTC

Created attachment 861304 [details]
/var/tmp/portage/cross-arm-none-eabi/binutils-2.40-r4/temp/binutils-config.logs.tar.xz

Comment 4 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev

2023-05-16 22:02:55 UTC

The ebuild seems to think your using lld (and your environment agrees) but it's actually using ld.bfd in practise. I'm not sure why that is.