Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 90388 - Too much pruning of the tree: stable=unstable=broken
Summary: Too much pruning of the tree: stable=unstable=broken
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-25 09:41 UTC by genbug
Modified: 2005-04-25 19:58 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description genbug 2005-04-25 09:41:28 UTC
All versions of rp-pppoe except 3.5-r9 have been removed.

This version stores a null username if used more than once, thus rendering the adsl connection useless. r7 did not do this but is no longer in portage, meanin g that the ebuild and the source that worked will have been removed even before the "upgrade" breaks the system.

This bug-report relates to the portage tree and the way versions are removed prematurely, not the rp-pppoe issue itself. #90219 covers that issue. Other examples could be sited.

Reproducible: Sometimes
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install and configure a working Gentoo system
2.Keep the system upto date paying attention to correctly update configs. 
3.Wait for one of your working packages to be removed from the tree and replaced by a poorly tested "update".
4. Discover you can no longer reinstall the working version because it has been removed from portage.

Actual Results:  
A broken / disfunctional system.

Expected Results:  
That a choise of working and maintained package versions are available and that 
the system may be maintained in a working state without constant intervention 
and frequent recourse to gentoo-cvs , masking and overlaying to bring back 
deleted packages.

It seems that some time at the end of last year a decision was made to reduce 
the file count in portage. 

While this seems desirable it must not be allowed to increase Gentoo's primary 
weakness: the ammount of maintainance effort required to keep a Gentoo system 
working.

This has been said many times on the forums but I think merits a bug #.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 13:21:37 UTC
Is this a dupe of Bug 90219 (fixed) or some more general complaint? 
Comment 2 genbug 2005-04-25 13:59:52 UTC
Sorry , I thought I was explicit enough.
[quote]
This bug-report relates to the portage tree and the way versions are removed prematurely, not the rp-pppoe issue itself. 
#90219 covers that issue. 
[/quote]
Comment 3 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-25 19:58:47 UTC
Bugzilla isn't the place to bring up larger concerns with process.  That kind of thing needs to be hashed out on the mailing list.  Use bugzilla to file issues with specific packages.  Thanks.