Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 89898 - media-gfx/xsane-0.96-r1 requires >=media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.4
Summary: media-gfx/xsane-0.96-r1 requires >=media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.4
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-21 00:37 UTC by Hypnos
Modified: 2005-04-23 15:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
xsane-0.96-r1.ebuild_fixeddep.patch (xsane-0.96-r1.ebuild_fixeddep.patch,358 bytes, patch)
2005-04-21 00:39 UTC, Hypnos
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hypnos 2005-04-21 00:37:28 UTC
Currently the ebuild reads:

******
DEPEND="media-gfx/sane-backends
(....)
******

when it should read

******
DEPEND="media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.4
(....)
******

At patch to the ebuild is attached.

The configure step of emerging xsane-0.96 fails otherwise.  This requirement is indicated in both the configure srcipt and the docfile "xsane.INSTALL".
Comment 1 Hypnos 2005-04-21 00:39:02 UTC
Created attachment 56813 [details, diff]
xsane-0.96-r1.ebuild_fixeddep.patch

xsane-0.96-r1.ebuild patch to fix sane-backends dep spec
Comment 2 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-23 13:18:27 UTC
As far as I can see from the ChangeLog, there has never been a sane-backends version < 1.0.5 in portage.
Could you perhaps explain how you noticed this "problem" and why you think it should be fixed? Just wondering...
Comment 3 Hypnos 2005-04-23 15:10:26 UTC
*shrug*   I hadn't upgraded xsane in a very long time.  When I finally did so last week, I ran into this problem, with the symptoms reported above and fixed with the patch supplied.

It's possible that I had to rebuild sane-backends anyway, and the error was due to a binary incompatibility and the fix was irrelevant.

Anyway, if Portage will have only >=sane-backends-1.0.4 into the future, it's a non-issue.  I am closing.