89399 – #58652 is secured? I just don't understand the gentoos security concept

Bug 89399 - #58652 is secured? I just don't understand the gentoos security concept

Summary: #58652 is secured? I just don't understand the gentoos security concept

Status:	RESOLVED INVALID

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Security
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	High normal
Assignee:	Gentoo Security

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:	58652
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2005-04-17 03:14 UTC by Thomas Bettler
Modified:	2011-10-30 22:38 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Thomas Bettler 2005-04-17 03:14:49 UTC

What might there be in?

Comment 1 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-04-17 05:49:19 UTC

http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/vulnerability-policy.xml

Comment 2 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-04-17 09:17:18 UTC

This has nothing to do with security. The bug you talked about was restricted to the devrel group, not to the Gentoo Security group (meaning us, security developers couldn't access it as well). Probably because it contained personal information...