Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 89214 - sys-fs/lvm2-2.01.09 should depend on >=sys-fs/device-mapper-1.01
Summary: sys-fs/lvm2-2.01.09 should depend on >=sys-fs/device-mapper-1.01
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Eric Edgar (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-15 12:58 UTC by Justin Wind
Modified: 2005-04-22 11:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Justin Wind 2005-04-15 12:58:39 UTC 
emerging lvm2 2.01.09 failed to link with a 1.00.19-r2 version device-mapper library. lvm2-2.01 should depend on the 1.01 versions of device-mapper, apparently.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Robert Forsman 2005-04-19 14:42:04 UTC 
Now I get this when I do an emerge -upvD world:

Calculating world dependencies /
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/device-mapper-1.01" have been maske
d.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-fs/device-mapper-1.01.00 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.
!!!    (dependency required by "sys-fs/lvm2-2.01.09" [ebuild])


!!! Problem with ebuild sys-fs/lvm2-2.01.09
!!! Possibly a DEPEND/*DEPEND problem.

!!! Depgraph creation failed.


  Perhaps making the non-masked lvm2 package depend on a masked version of another package is not such a good idea?
Comment 2 Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-19 20:40:17 UTC 
are you sure that you dont have an /etc/portage/package.keyword set for lvm2? As the tree portage tree is not marking this stable yet for any arch.
Comment 3 Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-22 11:39:26 UTC 
This ebuild is still marked unstable according to portage