Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 877009 - net-irc/quasselgrep: uses date of snapshot in PV rather than date of last commit
Summary: net-irc/quasselgrep: uses date of snapshot in PV rather than date of last commit
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Jakov Smolić
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-10-13 18:40 UTC by ephemer0l
Modified: 2022-10-13 18:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ephemer0l 2022-10-13 18:40:42 UTC
This is a derivative of my work[1], and there is no snapshot after Feb 11, 2019[2] making the ${PV} of 0_p20200830 wrong.




1. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/tree/master/net-irc/quasselgrep
2. https://github.com/fish-face/quasselgrep/commits/master
Comment 1 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-10-13 18:45:44 UTC
I don't know what the "derivative of your work" has to do with this. Anyway, in this case, it's pretty clear that the date is the date the snapshot was taken on, rather than the date of the last commit.

There's a mix of styles in the tree.
Comment 2 ephemer0l 2022-10-13 18:52:04 UTC
I was under the impression it's to be tracked with upstream commits for ${PV} for snapshots, but I guess I'm surly incorrect. Sorry for the noise.
Comment 3 ephemer0l 2022-10-13 18:55:46 UTC
as seen in the devmanual[1], under PV it states 'PV	Package version (excluding revision, if any), for example 6.3. It should reflect the upstream versioning scheme.'. Is this ignored for upstream where no tags are set, then?

1. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html