Bug 87376 – Better mod_lisp requirements for cl-tbnl

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Pupeno 2005-03-31 00:18:24 UTC]

I'll attach an ebuild for cl-tbnl that has better requirements. In case Apache2 is being used, nothing regarding Apache is required, if not, mod_lisp is required.
This is because in an environment where Apache2 was installed, cl-tbnl tried to install mod_lips (1) and Apache (1). That's not nice. If Apache2 is preferred, we should supouse the user is going to install mod_lisp2 by hand (untill we have a package for it).
Thanks.



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

[Comment 1 Pupeno 2005-03-31 00:20:00 UTC]

Created attachment 54917 [details]
ebuild for tbnl with better mod_lisp requirements.

[Comment 2 Pupeno 2005-04-28 23:22:41 UTC]

Created attachment 57553 [details]
An update to 0.5.5 of the better mod_lisp handling.

[Comment 3 parafin 2005-08-03 06:14:50 UTC]

Created attachment 64988 [details]
new use flag - standalone

It's a good idea, but not ideal. Cl-tbnl doesn't require apache at all. It has
its own httpd server. I suggest to add one more use flag - for example
standalone. So dependencies would be like this:
RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
    !standalone? (
	apache2? ( =www-apache/mod_lisp-1* ) !apache2? (
=www-apache/mod_lisp-2* )
    )"
Works fine for me.

[Comment 4 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2005-08-04 11:18:40 UTC]

I applied the suggestion from Comment #3.  Still haven't completed the improved
apache vs. apache2 handling, as it is dependent on getting mod_lisp for apache2
straightened out in portage.

[Comment 5 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2006-02-26 15:31:21 UTC]

This has since been fixed.