86359 – database scripts should be placed in /var/lib/bacula instead of /etc/bacula

Bug 86359 - database scripts should be placed in /var/lib/bacula instead of /etc/bacula

Summary: database scripts should be placed in /var/lib/bacula instead of /etc/bacula

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High trivial (vote)
Assignee:	App-Backup Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-03-23 02:22 UTC by teknux
Modified:	2005-07-02 21:05 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description teknux 2005-03-23 02:22:24 UTC

I think that all the database scripts are better placed in /var/lib/bacula instead of /etc/bacula . In my opinion it's cleaner and more appropriate than using the /etc/bacula directory that contains configuration files. At least it can be useful to make a separate directory inside /etc/bacula. At my work I've tested bacula with Mandrake and it uses to place databases scripts in /var/lib/bacula . Then I've installed bacula under gentoo on a production machine and it was a bit frustrating to see that scripts in /etc/bacula

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Always
2.
3.

Comment 1 Fernando Serboncini (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-07-02 21:05:22 UTC

This is fixed in the new 1.36.3-r1 ebuild.