Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 8623 - generic thunk code fails for method `virtual VOS::MetaObject* VOS::LocalSite::createMetaObjectT(const char*, ...)' which uses `...'
Summary: generic thunk code fails for method `virtual VOS::MetaObject* VOS::LocalS...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GCC Porting (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-01 15:27 UTC by Ferris McCormick (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-01-28 00:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ferris McCormick (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-10-01 15:27:28 UTC
Summary line error message is not useful.  I read it to say that the compiler
can't generate a procedure activation record for a particular method which
uses an elipsis parameter.  Now, I am willing to patch in a work-around (in
the user code) to get beyond this, but I interpret it as an internal (g++-3.2)
error with no try-this hint provided.

This is Gentoo related only to the extent that the compiler is gcc-3.2-r1 as
emerged for the system build.  The user software is something called the
'Virtual Object System' from <http://www.interreality.org>.  My primary use
for VOS is to make sure g++-3.2 can handle it, as it is one of several c++
applications I am trying to use as a compiler shakedown.

I understand that I have not provided nearly enough information to duplicate
the problem, nor do I expect you to.  What I need is some clue from the gcc
people about possible sources for this error message, and whether there has been a change with gcc I should have reacted to.

(By the way, I am perfectly willing just to discuss these issues through the
mailing lists if you at Gentoo prefer; I am mostly trying to get a feel for
gcc-3.2 at this point.)
Comment 1 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-10-21 02:44:51 UTC
you could consider querying the gcc-dev mailing lists on this matter. if you 
have a patch for gcc3.2 compat, you might consider sending it upstream.