For example, going by my usual process: - copy stuff over from overlay - cvs add the ebuild and any patches, etc $ echangelog "..." Cvs reports the following unknown files. Please use "cvs add" before running echangelog, or remove the files in question. ? files/digest-foo-1.0 This kind of makes FEATURES=autoaddcvs useless for digests if we have to now manually add them (as opposed to just running 'ebuild ... digest' after echangelog). Is it possible to maybe only display the message for files other than digests?
What has this to do with echangelog? You should just run ebuild ... digest *before* running echangelog, that should add the digests.
> What has this to do with echangelog? Because it echangelog didnt complaint about it before?
ah ok, I misunderstood the bug first.
ka0ttic, I changed the code to ignore digests and Manifest for cvs add, the same as is done for file listing. Please try http://gentoo.org/~agriffis/misc/echangelog and let me know if it works for you. There are a few other bugfixes bundled in that, so your feedback would be appreciated.
agriffis, that seems to fix the other bug, but not this one. Still getting the message for digests.
I don't believe you yet. Please prove it with an example, and make sure that you're running the echangelog you downloaded, not the one already installed on your system.
--(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> which echangelog /usr/bin/echangelog --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> ll total 20K drwxr-xr-x 2 ka0ttic users 128 Mar 9 11:03 CVS -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 658 Mar 9 11:10 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 427 Mar 9 11:10 Manifest drwxr-xr-x 3 ka0ttic users 192 Mar 9 11:10 files -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 1.2K Mar 9 11:10 herdstat-0.3.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 1.2K Mar 9 11:10 herdstat-0.4.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 254 Mar 9 11:10 metadata.xml --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> cvs add herdstat-0.4.ebuild cvs add: use 'cvs commit' to add this file permanently --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> echangelog "Version bump." Cvs reports the following unknown files. Please use "cvs add" before running echangelog, or remove the files in question. ? files/digest-herdstat-0.4 --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(1)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> mv /home/ka0ttic/echangelog /home/ka0ttic/bin/ --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> which echangelog /home/ka0ttic/bin/echangelog --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(0)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>> echangelog "Version bump." Cvs reports the following unknown files. Please use "cvs add" before running echangelog, or remove the files in question. ? files/digest-herdstat-0.4 --(ka0ttic@zeus)-(1)--(~/cvs/gentoo-x86/app-portage/herdstat)-- >>>
I think you just showed me that you're using /usr/bin/echangelog. Unless you downloaded from my dev-space and installed manually to /usr/bin, you're using the wrong echangelog. Am I reading this wrong?
Apologies maybe I should've made it easier to read. $ which echangelog /usr/bin/echangelog $ ll total 20K drwxr-xr-x 2 ka0ttic users 128 Mar 9 11:03 CVS -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 658 Mar 9 11:10 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 427 Mar 9 11:10 Manifest drwxr-xr-x 3 ka0ttic users 192 Mar 9 11:10 files -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 1.2K Mar 9 11:10 herdstat-0.3.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 1.2K Mar 9 11:10 herdstat-0.4.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 ka0ttic users 254 Mar 9 11:10 metadata.xml $ cvs add herdstat-0.4.ebuild cvs add: use 'cvs commit' to add this file permanently $ echangelog "Version bump." Cvs reports the following unknown files. Please use "cvs add" before running echangelog, or remove the files in question. ? files/digest-herdstat-0.4 $ mv /home/ka0ttic/echangelog /home/ka0ttic/bin/ $ which echangelog /home/ka0ttic/bin/echangelog $ echangelog "Version bump." Cvs reports the following unknown files. Please use "cvs add" before running echangelog, or remove the files in question. ? files/digest-herdstat-0.4
ka0ttic, I think you're suffering from a lack of hash. Oh wait, that sounds wrong. ;-) What I meant to say is that bash is hashing the location of echangelog, so in both invocations you're getting the version from /usr/bin. The "which" command is fooling you because it is an external command that ignores bash's hash. In other words, if you had run "rehash" prior to "echangelog" the second time, it would have worked.
> ka0ttic, I think you're suffering from a lack of hash. heh yeah you're right. didn't even think about that (should've used type instead of which). Sorry for the waste of time.
Fixed but forgot to mark
