Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 83716 - support for changing busybox.config and having new applications linked in initrd
Summary: support for changing busybox.config and having new applications linked in initrd
Status: RESOLVED REMIND
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Hosted Projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: genkernel (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Genkernel Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-01 13:14 UTC by David Bryson (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-06-15 12:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
adds support for busybox.links in genkernel (genkernel-busybox_links.patch,1.68 KB, patch)
2005-03-01 13:15 UTC, David Bryson (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Bryson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-01 13:14:20 UTC
genkernel has a staticly defined list of busybox applications it links no matter what the compiled applications are.  A list of the compiled applications is produced at the end of the busybox build-cycle.  This patch adds support for using this list to create the symlinks present on the initrd.  This way, every compilation of busybox can have all the proper symlinks created.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.




will be attaching a patch momentarily
Comment 1 David Bryson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-01 13:15:14 UTC
Created attachment 52409 [details, diff]
adds support for busybox.links in genkernel

should apply cleanly to cvs
Comment 2 David Bryson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-01 15:54:02 UTC
there is a bug currently when initrd-modules are enabled
for some reason modprobe overwrites the busybox executable, and I'm not sure why.  As soon as I fix it I'll post an updated patch.
Comment 3 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-15 12:01:40 UTC
Let me know when you have an updated patch for comment #2.