Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 8313 - ut2003demo 1080c must be applied on top of 1080b
Summary: ut2003demo 1080c must be applied on top of 1080b
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Games (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: SpanKY
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-24 10:54 UTC by Chris Moeller
Modified: 2003-02-04 19:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Moeller 2002-09-24 10:54:20 UTC
1080c doesn't appear to be a stand-alone patch.


The server browser is obviously missing the jittery sorting fix, which is part 
of the 1080b update. Apparently, they decided not to make 1080c a cumulative 
patch.

I have already made an ebuild myself, the process is as simple as applying both 
patches in order, but I leave that up to you in the event that you find a 
cleaner way of arranging the ebuild. I'll upload and link later if it becomes 
necessary.
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-09-24 16:49:15 UTC
if you post the ebuild we'll take a look at it
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-09-25 10:57:47 UTC
phoenix: im stealing this one since (1) i put out the 1080c patch and (2) i 
have an ebuild that works
Comment 3 phoen][x 2002-09-25 12:46:49 UTC
Heyas Spanky,

you didnt change too much did you? I looked into the ebuild but i was unable to
find any new, major enhancements (no offense there) - if you implemented a major
change (layout,whatever..) please tell me. Sorry for not taking care of that
stuff myself, i lost 512MB ram yesterday so i had quite some downtime (crappy
noname ram, dont you ever buy that). Thanks for your help,

-phoen][x-
besides, what do you mean with "(2) i have an ebuild that works" - mine worked,
didnt it?
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-09-25 12:54:10 UTC
i just abstracted your code ...
basically i defined 'PATCH1' and 'PATCH2' and rewrote bits in a for loop ...
for PATCH in $PATCH1 $PATCH2 ; do
   <patch code>
done

i use a lot of noname ram ;)
well, pc133 i do ... got about 2+gigs of it in 2 servers
my desktop though has the good stuff for pc333 :D