Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 829714 - dev-perl/libwww-perl-6.580.0-r1: stable keyword reversion
Summary: dev-perl/libwww-perl-6.580.0-r1: stable keyword reversion
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-12-20 14:08 UTC by Richard Freeman
Modified: 2021-12-20 22:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Richard Freeman gentoo-dev 2021-12-20 14:08:38 UTC
Commit 53144a5ba626da937a0a8387285f84bfbdf53b2c appears to have reverted stable keywords for dev-perl/libwww-perl-6.580.0

Based on what I can see in git I don't think this was intentional, so I'm raising this for awareness.  If the change is intentional then apologies for the bugspam though that probably should be mentioned in the commit message.
Comment 1 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2021-12-20 18:10:23 UTC
(In reply to Richard Freeman from comment #0)
> Commit 53144a5ba626da937a0a8387285f84bfbdf53b2c appears to have reverted
> stable keywords for dev-perl/libwww-perl-6.580.0
> 
> Based on what I can see in git I don't think this was intentional, so I'm
> raising this for awareness.  If the change is intentional then apologies for
> the bugspam though that probably should be mentioned in the commit message.

That was actually correct, sorry. 

(580 was using the tarball of 550 so far, so real 580 was untested up to now. We should probably stable 600 soon.)
Comment 2 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-12-20 22:50:56 UTC
Definitely intentional because, as explained in the commit message, it was using the wrong version. I can try be more descriptive in future though, sure, but you can clearly see it adds a Manifest entry which didn't even exist before (and git mv was used for a reason).
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-12-20 22:52:14 UTC
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Definitely intentional because, as explained in the commit message, it was
> using the wrong version. I can try be more descriptive in future though,
> sure, but you can clearly see it adds a Manifest entry which didn't even
> exist before (and git mv was used for a reason).

(I also named the pkgcheck warning which could've been looked up ;))