configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-static ------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an unstable amd64 chroot image at a tinderbox (==build bot) name: 17.1_no_multilib-j4-20211209-113836 ------------------------------------------------------------------- The log matches a QA pattern or a pattern requested by a Gentoo developer.
Created attachment 758829 [details] emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 758830 [details] etc.portage.tar.bz2
Created attachment 758831 [details] net-proxy:privoxy-3.0.33:20211213-174740.log
--disable-static is enforced by portage, not by ebuild. Upstream doesn't support this option because it provides no libraries or statically build binaries. So either portage should not enforce this option everywhere, or QA check should ignore this warning for --disable-static option.
The portage behavior is specified by PMS. There is nothing the portage team can really do about it. See also bug 814368.
I'm guessing this is because of: --enable-static-linking Use static linking instead of dynamic linking (ie. LDFLAGS=-static)
I think it would be acceptable to ignore this bug report until a new EAPI provides a way to resolve it.