I Wrote an Ebuild for Classic Forum 3.0, a very fast internet forum application. You can download the portage entry at the URI above. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
I made a small bugfix right now, so please download it again :)
You should attach the .ebuil only. Otherwise, run "repoman" in that directory and fix the complains...
Created attachment 51511 [details] cforum-3.0.ebuild Cleaned a bit, removed amd64.
Hm, there is a problem with this ebuild: I saw that emerge will give in make install prefix and exec_prefix as an command line parameter parameter. This projects uses several perl modules which have to be installed, and the Makefile for these modules will be generated during the compile process. But during the compile process, the prefix and exec_prefix values will be the values given by the configure script. So later in the installation process, the perl modules will be directly installed to /usr/lib/cforum. Is there any idea what I can do about it?
reassigning...
Created attachment 68740 [details] Ebuild for version 3.4.4 This is the ebuild for version 3.4.4. This ebuild seems to work perfectly, I made some bugfixes in the CForum build system to work with portage. Maybe you can now add it to the official portage tree.
Created attachment 69656 [details] Ebuild for version 3.4.6 Ebuild file for new version 3.4.6
cforum is now in our unofficial overlay: http://svn.gnqs.org/projects/gentoo-webapps-overlay/browser This ebuild was copied from wwwtech.de/cforum/download/cforum-3.4.11.ebuild Please note that the overlay is unofficial, not a Gentoo project, and not supported. It is intended to provide easier access to new web applications.
I am, you know, confused. How is this "RESOLVED UPSTREAM"? Neither is the bug report resolved (the package is not in Portage yet), nor has this resolution anything to do with the upstream.
(In reply to comment #9) > I am, you know, confused. How is this "RESOLVED UPSTREAM"? What about reading Comment #8?
