F4L is an open source development environment for Macromedia Flash, a multi-platform format widely used for web applications and vector animation. Basically, you can make interactive eye candy for your web site or any other purpose while maintaini Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
K
Kåre: "new ebuild" as summary isn't a good idea
Did you get this to compile? ./configure && make got following problems here on amd64: 1. Compilation error: c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/qt/3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -c cbrushtool.cpp cbrushtool.cpp: In member function `virtual void CBrushLine::drawShape(QPainter&)': cbrushtool.cpp:34: error: no match for call to `(QPen) ()' Any ideas? Had run make -i, seams the only error. 2. Following warning cbrushtool.cpp: In member function `virtual void CBrushLine::moveBy(double, double)': cbrushtool.cpp:60: warning: passing `double' for converting 1 of `void QPoint::setX(int)' This warning appears several times....
The mentinond compilation bugs from the beta version f4lm-0.1.tar.gz can be fixed with the CVS version. As f4lm-0.1.tar.gz is old(2003), could you request upstream a new "beta" version.tar.gz, so we are in sync with CVS and patching is unneeded.
Filled in a Bug upstream, to get a new beta version https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1153340&group_id=87799&atid=584425
Created attachment 53017 [details] f4l-0.2.ebuild Upstream bug report successful, we have an actual snapshot. Initial ebuild to be added into portage. Can someone suggest a category here, K
Created attachment 53017 [details] f4l-0.2.ebuild Upstream bug report successful, we have an actual snapshot. Initial ebuild to be added into portage. Can someone suggest a category here, Kåre can you add "Inclusion" to the Keywords above.
Hi Roland. Thx for all the work you have put into this ebuild. To the Category, I think it should be placed under "net-www" I would be very nice, if the ebuild could make a menu item/icon under "Graphic" under Gnome/KDE menu. Is the correct bin name f4lm? should't it be f4l without the "m"? Thx again.
Created attachment 53164 [details] f4l-0.2.ebuild (New package) - Added Desktop entry Appears at same place as e.g. bluefish - Minor (SRC_URI) Yes, the resulting executable is "f4lm", upstream....
Created attachment 66367 [details] ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
Created attachment 66368 [details] emerge info Another user (gentoo-user ml) had the same sandbox violation problem. Can other reproduce this?
Created attachment 66373 [details, diff] ebuild fixes: sandbox violation, qt-3 dep, icon path
Re-assign.
*** Bug 35983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I have made an ebuild for version 0.2.1. gcc 4.1 compatibility patch was needed. Everything is available at http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/sunrise/media-gfx/f4l/
Created attachment 93945 [details] f4l-0.2.1.ebuild
Created attachment 93946 [details, diff] files/f4l-0.2.1-gcc41.patch
(In reply to comment #14) > Created an attachment (id=93945) [edit] > f4l-0.2.1.ebuild > the patch for gcc doesn't work for some.
Created attachment 132230 [details] updated f4l-0.2.1.ebuild This ebuild doesn't work anymore with new qt3-eclass. instead of ${QTDIR}/bin/qmake we have to use eqmake3. Otherwise it will use qt4-qmake, and this causes many errors ;) Furthermore i use qt_min_version for the qt3-dependency, which is nicer (in my opinion :P)
Created attachment 132232 [details] f4l-0.2.1.ebuild (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=132230) [edit] > updated f4l-0.2.1.ebuild > > This ebuild doesn't work anymore with new qt3-eclass. > instead of ${QTDIR}/bin/qmake we have to use eqmake3. Otherwise it will use > qt4-qmake, and this causes many errors ;) > > Furthermore i use qt_min_version for the qt3-dependency, which is nicer (in my > opinion :P) > Sorry... I did not use qt_min_version in the last ebuild i posted, this one now does.
has this packagestill sense? i mean..with gnash....
(In reply to comment #21) > has this packagestill sense? > > i mean..with gnash.... > Isn't gnash just a player?
(In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > has this packagestill sense? > > > > i mean..with gnash.... > > > > Isn't gnash just a player? > yes, it is: --- eix gnash * net-www/gnash Available versions: ~0.8.0 **9999 {agg ffmpeg gstreamer kde mad nsplugin video_cards_i810 xml} Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash --> Description: Gnash is a GNU Flash movie player that supports many SWF v7 features --- The bigger proglem is that f4l is unmaintained. 0.2.1 is from 2005, the last cvs-commit is from about 2 years ago... f4l just seems to be the most feature-rich flash development environment. But i can't tell you more, i don't use it (yet), just wrote the ebuild ;)
there as several flash implementation none complete and really working...community should merge in one single project... ok but i think it's OT here :)
Created attachment 209707 [details, diff] additional patch in order to compile with newer gcc I don't sure if it is 4.4 gcc. Yes, I know this program is dead upstream; but as its ebuild is in sunrise, I think this patch may be useful...
Created attachment 209709 [details] ...and ebuild which uses this patch
Qt3 app Closing as wont be fixed since we dont add qt3 apps any more If you still want to use this please consider moving it to kde-sunset overlay http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde-sunset.git;a=summary
If you still want to use this please consider moving it to kde-sunset overlay http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde-sunset.git;a=summary
