Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 819777 - dev-cpp/yaml-cpp 0.7.0-r1 should be in another slot
Summary: dev-cpp/yaml-cpp 0.7.0-r1 should be in another slot
Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Alexey
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-10-23 17:07 UTC by Szef
Modified: 2021-10-24 11:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Szef 2021-10-23 17:07:53 UTC
dev-cpp/yaml-cpp from 0.7.0 is not backward compatible with 0.6.3, so it should go to another slot

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Actually my working project failed to compile after upgrade to 0.7.0-r1, as lib's classes signatures changed.
Not sure, if I can explain any better.
Comment 2 Szef 2021-10-23 17:28:16 UTC
include/yaml-cpp/exceptions
Comment 3 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2021-10-23 20:19:40 UTC
When possible, typically it's better to try to avoid slotting and instead ensure packages are compatible with the new one so we can move on (especially on 0.x.x semver packages without a stable API, we'll just be accumulating slots without real support).

Any chances to just migrate your project instead? Same would go for any ::gentoo packages failing with this.
Comment 4 Szef 2021-10-23 21:53:43 UTC
My project will be fine, I fixed it already. 
If there is no gentoo packages that rely on changed part of the API, and it is not worth slotting, then bug can be closed.
Comment 5 Alexey 2021-10-24 11:41:46 UTC
Slots are for cases when both versions can be installed simultaneously. This package installs yaml-cpp.pc, which presumably clients use via pkg-config. The both packages can't install the same .pc file, so at least one of these types of clients will be broken. Unless we go the python eclasses way, but no.