Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 818670 - dev-java/openjdk-17.0.8.1_p1 does not respect CFLAGS
Summary: dev-java/openjdk-17.0.8.1_p1 does not respect CFLAGS
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: cflags
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-10-17 11:53 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2024-04-12 09:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log.xz (build.log.xz,676.16 KB, application/x-xz)
2021-10-17 11:53 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-10-17 11:53:43 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: dev-java/openjdk-17_p35 does not respect CFLAGS.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)

NOTE:
This machine uses GCC-11: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
To reproduce this issue you may want to add "-frecord-gcc-switches" to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/FFLAGS/FCFLAGS. If this is not something about c/c++ context see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect CFLAGS.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-10-17 11:53:50 UTC
Created attachment 745443 [details]
build.log.xz

build log and emerge --info (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-11-09 07:47:55 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 17_p35 - Updating summary.
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-11-18 06:51:59 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.1_p12 - Updating summary.
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-07-28 06:41:00 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.3_p7-r1 - Updating summary.
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-12-10 14:14:21 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.5_p8 - Updating summary.
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-02-02 15:40:13 UTC
libarchive_tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.6_p10 - Updating summary.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-06-09 05:51:23 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.6_p10-r1 - Updating summary.
Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-08-14 11:59:13 UTC
python-3.12_tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.7_p7 - Updating summary.
Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2024-02-22 11:38:01 UTC
binutils2.42_tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.8.1_p1 - Updating summary.
Comment 10 Volkmar W. Pogatzki 2024-04-12 09:21:26 UTC
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #9)
> binutils2.42_tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 17.0.8.1_p1 -
> Updating summary.

Can it be reproduced with 17.0.10_p7? The old version is gone.